↓ Skip to main content

Physical and Social Pains in Borderline Disorder and Neuroanatomical Correlates: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Physical and Social Pains in Borderline Disorder and Neuroanatomical Correlates: A Systematic Review
Published in
Current Psychiatry Reports, March 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11920-014-0443-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Déborah Ducasse, Philippe Courtet, Emilie Olié

Abstract

Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is a common psychiatric disorder, the core features of which are affective dysregulation, identity disturbances, and problems in social interaction, with an intense fear of loss, abandonment, or rejection by social partners. Self-injurious behaviors (SIB), such as superficial cutting, occur in 70-80 % of BPD patients, which are associated with emotional relief. Intriguingly, the majority of BPD patients report reduced or no pain associated with SIB, whereas BPD patients are over-represented in chronic pain patients. Thus, studying pain perception in such patients may help to understand the pathophysiology of BPD, but also the interaction between affective and physical dimensions of pain. We conducted a systematic review dealing with physical and social pains in BPD patients, with a special focus on neuroimaging data. SIB appear to be an inadequate strategy to regulate negative emotions that may be related to social/psychological pain, by increasing dorsolateral prefrontal cortex activation in order to regulate amygdala activation. In addition, abnormal hyperactivation of the insula is a possible trait marker of BPD, and might contribute to modified pain sensitivity. When considering psychological pain in BPD patients, neuroanatomical studies have shown a hyper-responsive subcortical limbic network and a deficient regulatory control system operating through anterior brain regions. Promising therapeutic strategies should target neuroanatomical and neurobiological dysfunctions, which lead to altered pain perception in BPD patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 112 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 17 15%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 22%
Neuroscience 7 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Decision Sciences 1 <1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 29 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,408,391
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Current Psychiatry Reports
#549
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,191
of 221,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Psychiatry Reports
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.