↓ Skip to main content

Introducing novel approaches for examining the variability of individuals’ physical activity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Sports Sciences, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Introducing novel approaches for examining the variability of individuals’ physical activity
Published in
Journal of Sports Sciences, October 2014
DOI 10.1080/02640414.2014.951067
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alex V. Rowlands, Sjaan R. Gomersall, Catrine Tudor-Locke, David R. Bassett, Minsoo Kang, François Fraysse, Barbara Ainsworth, Tim S. Olds

Abstract

Abstract Tudor-Locke and colleagues previously assessed steps/day for 1 year. The aim of this study was to use this data set to introduce a novel approach for the investigation of whether individual's physical activity exhibits periodicity fluctuating round a mean and, if so, the degree of fluctuation and whether the mean changes over time. Twenty-three participants wore a pedometer for 365 days, recorded steps/day and whether the day was a workday. Fourier transform of each participant's daily steps data showed the physical activity had a periodicity of 7 days in half of the participants, matching the periodicity of the workday pattern. Activity level remained stable in half of the participants, decreased in ten participants and increased in two. In conclusion, the 7-day periodicity of activity in half of the participants and correspondence with the workday pattern suggest a social or environmental influence. The novel analytical approach introduced herein allows the determination of the periodicity of activity, the degree of variability in activity that is tolerated during day-to-day life and whether the activity level is stable. Results from the use of these methodologies in larger data sets may enable a more focused approach to the design of interventions that aim to increase activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 42 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 27%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Professor 2 4%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 10 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,136,697
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sports Sciences
#2,360
of 3,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,994
of 259,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sports Sciences
#47
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.