↓ Skip to main content

Ecosystem approach to inland fisheries: research needs and implementation strategies

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Letters, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecosystem approach to inland fisheries: research needs and implementation strategies
Published in
Biology Letters, February 2011
DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0046
Pubmed ID
Authors

T. Douglas Beard, Robert Arlinghaus, Steven J. Cooke, Peter B. McIntyre, Sena De Silva, Devin Bartley, Ian G. Cowx

Abstract

Inland fisheries are a vital component in the livelihoods and food security of people throughout the world, as well as contributing huge recreational and economic benefits. These valuable assets are jeopardized by lack of research-based understanding of the impacts of fisheries on inland ecosystems, and similarly the impact of human activities associated with inland waters on fisheries and aquatic biodiversity. To explore this topic, an international workshop was organized in order to examine strategies to incorporate fisheries into ecosystem approaches for management of inland waters. To achieve this goal, a new research agenda is needed that focuses on: quantifying the ecosystem services provided by fresh waters; quantifying the economic, social and nutritional benefits of inland fisheries; improving assessments designed to evaluate fisheries exploitation potential; and examining feedbacks between fisheries, ecosystem productivity and aquatic biodiversity. Accomplishing these objectives will require merging natural and social science approaches to address coupled social-ecological system dynamics.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 198 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 29%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 15 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 74 35%
Environmental Science 50 24%
Social Sciences 10 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 2%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 43 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#4,904,508
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Biology Letters
#2,120
of 3,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,154
of 107,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Letters
#23
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.3. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.