↓ Skip to main content

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: impact on systemic hemodynamics and renal and cardiac function in patients with cirrhosis

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: impact on systemic hemodynamics and renal and cardiac function in patients with cirrhosis
Published in
American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology, October 2017
DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00094.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Troels M Busk, Flemming Bendtsen, Jørgen H Poulsen, Jens O Clemmesen, Fin S Larsen, Jens P Goetze, Jens S Iversen, Magnus T Jensen, Rasmus Møgelvang, Erling B Pedersen, Jesper N Bech, Søren Møller

Abstract

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) alleviates portal hypertension and possibly increases central blood volume (CBV). Moreover, renal function often improves; however, its effects on cardiac function are unclear. The aims of our study were to examine the effects of TIPS on hemodynamics and renal and cardiac function in patients with cirrhosis. In 25 cirrhotic patients, we analyzed systemic, cardiac, and splanchnic hemodynamics by catheterization of the liver veins and right heart chambers before and 1 week after TIPS. Additionally, we measured renal and cardiac markers and performed advanced echocardiography before, one week after, and four months after TIPS. CBV increased significantly after TIPS (+4.6%, P<0.05). Cardiac output (CO) increased (+15.3%, P<0.005) due to an increase in stroke volume (SV) (+11.1%, P<0.005), whereas heart rate (HR) was initially unchanged. Cardiopulmonary pressures increased after TIPS, whereas copeptin, a marker of vasopressin, decreased (-18%, p<0.005) and pro-atrial natriuretic peptide increased (+52%, p<0.0005) one week after TIPS, and returned to baseline four months after TIPS. Plasma NGAL, renin, aldosterone and serum creatinine decreased after TIPS (-36%, p<0.005, -65%, p<0.05, -90%, p<0.005, and -13%, p<0.005, respectively). Echocardiography revealed subtle changes in cardiac function after TIPS, although these were within the normal range. TIPS increases CBV by increasing CO and SV, whereas HR is initially unaltered. These results indicate an inability to increase the heart rate in response to a hemodynamic challenge that only partially increases CBV after TIPS. These changes, however, are sufficient for improving renal function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Materials Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,918,049
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology
#1,167
of 2,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,993
of 338,126 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Physiology: Gastrointestinal & Liver Physiology
#13
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,126 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.