↓ Skip to main content

The effect of insulin on bone mineral density among women with type 2 diabetes: a SWAN Pharmacoepidemiology study

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
The effect of insulin on bone mineral density among women with type 2 diabetes: a SWAN Pharmacoepidemiology study
Published in
Osteoporosis International, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00198-017-4276-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

K. Ruppert, J. Cauley, Y. Lian, J. C. Zgibor, C. Derby, D. H. Solomon

Abstract

This was a longitudinal study examining the effects of insulin use on bone mineral density loss. Insulin use was found to be associated with greater bone mineral density loss at the femoral neck among women with diabetes mellitus. Women with diabetes mellitus (DM) have higher bone mineral density (BMD) and experience slower BMD loss but have an increased risk of fracture. The data regarding the effect of insulin treatment on BMD remains conflicted. We examined the impact of insulin initiation on BMD. We investigated the annual changes in BMD associated with the new use of insulin among women with DM in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Propensity score (PS) matching, which is a statistical method that helps balance the baseline characteristics of women who did and did not initiate insulin, was used. Covariates with a potential impact on bone health were included in all models. Mixed model regression was used to test the change in BMD between the two groups. Median follow-up time was 5.4 years. The cohort consisted of 110 women, mean age, 53.6 years; 49% white and 51% black. Women using insulin (n = 55) were similar on most relevant characteristics to the 55 not using insulin. Median diabetes duration for the user group was 10 vs. 5.0 years for the non-user group. There was a greater loss of BMD at the femoral neck among insulin users (- 1.1%) vs non-users (- 0.77%) (p = 0.04). There were no differences in BMD loss at the spine - 0.30% vs - 0.32% (p = 0.85) or at the total hip - 0.31% vs - 0.25 (p = 0.71), respectively. Women with T2DM who initiated insulin experienced a more rapid BMD loss at the femoral neck as compared to women who did use insulin.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Engineering 2 5%
Materials Science 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2022.
All research outputs
#5,095,844
of 24,380,426 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#871
of 3,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,310
of 332,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#16
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,380,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,710 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.