↓ Skip to main content

A double-edged sword: review of the interplay between physical health and mental health

Overview of attention for article published in Irish Journal of Medical Science, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
Title
A double-edged sword: review of the interplay between physical health and mental health
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11845-014-1205-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Behan, R. Doyle, S. Masterson, D. Shiers, M. Clarke

Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that there is interplay between physical and mental health, with causality in both directions. A common theme across countries is the uncertainty surrounding who should act as gatekeeper for physical health matters in psychiatry. Much of the metabolic monitoring is carried out by psychiatrists who often feel ill equipped to treat medical problems such as abnormal cholesterol or disturbances of glucose metabolism. However many patients do not attend primary care on a regular basis and may not be likely to follow through on referral to primary care. This review aims to examine the interplay between co-morbid physical and mental health conditions, identify the physical health conditions particularly associated with severe affective and psychotic illness and briefly discuss interventions and recommendations in this area. As people with severe mental illness die 10-20 years younger than their peers, with much of this premature mortality due to cardiovascular disease, this topic is emerging as one of great importance amongst clinicians and policymakers internationally.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 90 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 22%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 34%
Psychology 10 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 24 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#4,312,306
of 25,260,058 outputs
Outputs from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#183
of 1,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,226
of 268,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Irish Journal of Medical Science
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,260,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.