| Title |
Diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials for clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Documenta Ophthalmologica, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10633-014-9466-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niphon Chirapapaisan, Sawarin Laotaweerungsawat, Wanicha Chuenkongkaew, Patthanee Samsen, Ngamkae Ruangvaravate, Atiporn Thuangtong, Nacha Chanvarapha |
| Abstract |
Prolonged latency of visual evoked potentials (VEP) has been used to identify clinically silent lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) suspects. The objective of this study was to determine the reliability of VEP to predict the development of MS in MS suspects. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 8% |
| Psychology | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2015.
All research outputs
#7,203,348
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#59
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,691
of 259,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them