↓ Skip to main content

‘Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ or ‘allowing natural death’? The time for resuscitation community to review its boundaries and its terminology

Overview of attention for article published in Resuscitation, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
61 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
‘Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation’ or ‘allowing natural death’? The time for resuscitation community to review its boundaries and its terminology
Published in
Resuscitation, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.09.012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theodoros Xanthos

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Researcher 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Chemistry 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Unknown 3 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2014.
All research outputs
#1,068,495
of 25,756,531 outputs
Outputs from Resuscitation
#281
of 5,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,129
of 264,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Resuscitation
#7
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,756,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.