You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Two ancient human genomes reveal Polynesian ancestry among the indigenous Botocudos of Brazil
|
---|---|
Published in |
Current Biology, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.cub.2014.09.078 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Anna-Sapfo Malaspinas, Oscar Lao, Hannes Schroeder, Morten Rasmussen, Maanasa Raghavan, Ida Moltke, Paula F. Campos, Francisca Santana Sagredo, Simon Rasmussen, Vanessa F. Gonçalves, Anders Albrechtsen, Morten E. Allentoft, Philip L.F. Johnson, Mingkun Li, Silvia Reis, Danilo V. Bernardo, Michael DeGiorgio, Ana T. Duggan, Murilo Bastos, Yong Wang, Jesper Stenderup, J. Victor Moreno-Mayar, Søren Brunak, Thomas Sicheritz-Ponten, Emily Hodges, Gregory J. Hannon, Ludovic Orlando, T. Douglas Price, Jeffrey D. Jensen, Rasmus Nielsen, Jan Heinemeier, Jesper Olsen, Claudia Rodrigues-Carvalho, Marta Mirazón Lahr, Walter A. Neves, Manfred Kayser, Thomas Higham, Mark Stoneking, Sergio D.J. Pena, Eske Willerslev |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 79 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 22% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 5% |
Brazil | 2 | 3% |
Japan | 2 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 3% |
New Zealand | 2 | 3% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
South Africa | 1 | 1% |
Philippines | 1 | 1% |
Other | 7 | 9% |
Unknown | 40 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 59 | 75% |
Scientists | 16 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 178 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 168 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 20% |
Researcher | 34 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
Student > Master | 12 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 6% |
Other | 39 | 22% |
Unknown | 23 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 40 | 22% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 9 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 2% |
Other | 21 | 12% |
Unknown | 28 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#210,694
of 25,706,302 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#1,016
of 14,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,950
of 274,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#16
of 179 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,706,302 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 62.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 179 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.