↓ Skip to main content

Sensor manufacturer, temperature, and cyanobacteria morphology affect phycocyanin fluorescence measurements

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Sensor manufacturer, temperature, and cyanobacteria morphology affect phycocyanin fluorescence measurements
Published in
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11356-017-0473-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline M. Hodges, Susanna A. Wood, Jonathan Puddick, Christopher G. McBride, David P. Hamilton

Abstract

Sensors to measure phycocyanin fluorescence in situ are becoming widely used as they may provide useful proxies for cyanobacterial biomass. In this study, we assessed five phycocyanin sensors from three different manufacturers. A combination of culture-based experiments and a 30-sample field study was used to examine the effect of temperature and cyanobacteria morphology on phycocyanin fluorescence. Phycocyanin fluorescence increased with decrease in temperature, although this varied with manufacturer and cyanobacterial density. Phycocyanin fluorescence and cyanobacterial biovolume were strongly correlated (R (2) > 0.83, P < 0.05) for single-celled and filamentous species. The relationship was generally weak for a colonial strain of Microcystis aeruginosa. The colonial culture was divided into different colony size classes and phycocyanin measured before and after manual disaggregation. No differences were measured, and the observation that fluorescence spiked when large colonial aggregates drifted past the light source suggests that sample heterogeneity, rather than lack of light penetration into the colonies, was the main cause of the poor relationship. Analysis of field samples showed a strong relationship between in situ phycocyanin fluorescence and spectrophotometrically measured phycocyanin (R (2) > 0.7, P < 0.001). However, there was only a weak relationship between phycocyanin fluorescence and cyanobacterial biovolume for two sensors (R (2) = 0.22-0.29, P < 0.001) and a non-significant relationship for the third sensor (R (2) = 0.29, P > 0.4). The five sensors tested in our study differed in their output of phycocyanin fluorescence, upper working limits (1200 to > 12,000 μg/L), and responses to temperature, highlighting the need for comprehensive sensor calibration and knowledge on the limitations of specific sensors prior to deployment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 19%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 4 8%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 21 44%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Unspecified 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2017.
All research outputs
#5,984,727
of 23,917,076 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#1,092
of 9,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,416
of 331,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science and Pollution Research
#38
of 292 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,917,076 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,884 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 292 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.