↓ Skip to main content

Trematodes of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: emerging patterns of diversity and richness in coral reef fishes

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Parasitology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trematodes of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia: emerging patterns of diversity and richness in coral reef fishes
Published in
International Journal for Parasitology, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.08.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas H. Cribb, Nathan J. Bott, Rodney A. Bray, Marissa K.A. McNamara, Terrence L. Miller, Mathew J. Nolan, Scott C. Cutmore

Abstract

The Great Barrier Reef holds the richest array of marine life found anywhere in Australia, including a diverse and fascinating parasite fauna. Members of one group, the trematodes, occur as sexually mature adult worms in almost all Great Barrier Reef bony fish species. Although the first reports of these parasites were made 100years ago, the fauna has been studied systematically for only the last 25years. When the fauna was last reviewed in 1994 there were 94 species known from the Great Barrier Reef and it was predicted that there might be 2,270 in total. There are now 326 species reported for the region, suggesting that we are in a much improved position to make an accurate prediction of true trematode richness. Here we review the current state of knowledge of the fauna and the ways in which our understanding of this fascinating group is changing. Our best estimate of the true richness is now a range, 1,100-1,800 species. However there remains considerable scope for even these figures to be incorrect given that fewer than one-third of the fish species of the region have been examined for trematodes. Our goal is a comprehensive characterisation of this fauna, and we outline what work needs to be done to achieve this and discuss whether this goal is practically achievable or philosophically justifiable.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 41 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 55%
Environmental Science 4 9%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 5 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2015.
All research outputs
#7,148,499
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Parasitology
#598
of 2,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,488
of 250,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Parasitology
#6
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,078 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.