↓ Skip to main content

The role of the Yorta Yorta people in clarifying the common interest in sustainable management of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia

Overview of attention for article published in Policy Sciences, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
The role of the Yorta Yorta people in clarifying the common interest in sustainable management of the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia
Published in
Policy Sciences, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11077-012-9164-8
Authors

Amanda H. Lynch, David Griggs, Lee Joachim, Jackie Walker

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 24%
Environmental Science 12 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 19 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,447,530
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Policy Sciences
#247
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,736
of 172,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Policy Sciences
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,793 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them