↓ Skip to main content

Chromosomal damage as prognosis marker in cervical carcinogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Cytology and Genetics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Chromosomal damage as prognosis marker in cervical carcinogenesis
Published in
Cytology and Genetics, June 2014
DOI 10.3103/s0095452714030049
Authors

E. I. Cortés-Gutiérrez, M. I. Dávila-Rodríguez, R. M. Cerda-Flores

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Lecturer 1 9%
Librarian 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Arts and Humanities 1 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,730,142
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Cytology and Genetics
#59
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,545
of 228,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cytology and Genetics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them