↓ Skip to main content

Muscle thixotropy as a tool in the study of proprioception

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
66 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Muscle thixotropy as a tool in the study of proprioception
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00221-014-4088-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uwe Proske, Anthony Tsay, Trevor Allen

Abstract

When a muscle relaxes after a contraction, cross-bridges between actin and myosin in sarcomeres detach, but about 1 % spontaneously form new, non-force-generating attachments. These bridges give muscle its thixotropic property. They remain in place for long periods if the muscle is left undisturbed and give the muscle a passive stiffness in response to a stretch. They are detached by stretch, but reform at the new length. If the muscle is then shortened, the presence of these bridges prevents muscle fibres from shortening and they fall slack. So, resting muscle can be in one of two states, where it presents in response to a stretch with a high stiffness, if no slack is present, or with a compliant response in the presence of slack. Intrafusal fibres of muscle spindles show thixotropic behaviour. For spindles, after a conditioning contraction, they are left stretch sensitive, with a high level of background discharge. Alternatively, if after the contraction the muscle is shortened, intrafusal fibres fall slack, leaving spindles with a low level of background activity and insensitivity to stretch. Muscle spindles are receptors involved in the senses of human limb position and movement. The technique of muscle conditioning can be used to help understand the contribution of muscle spindles to these senses and how the brain interprets signals arising in spindles. When, in a two-arm position-matching task, elbow muscles of the two arms are deliberately conditioned in opposite ways, the blindfolded subject makes large position errors of which they are unaware. The evidence suggests that the brain is concerned with the difference signal coming from the antagonists acting at the elbow and with the overall difference in signal from the two arms. Another way of measuring position sense is to use a single arm and indicate its perceived position with a pointer. Here, there is no access to a signal from the other limb, and position sense relies on referral to a central map of the body, the postural schema.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 127 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 24%
Researcher 19 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 18 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 20 15%
Sports and Recreations 16 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 9%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,016,594
of 24,404,997 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#121
of 3,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,175
of 243,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#1
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,404,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,344 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.