You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Revascularization Decisions in Patients With Stable Angina and Intermediate Lesions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1161/circinterventions.114.001608 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gabor G Toth, Balint Toth, Nils P Johnson, Frederic De Vroey, Luigi Di Serafino, Stylianos Pyxaras, Dan Rusinaru, Giuseppe Di Gioia, Mariano Pellicano, Emanuele Barbato, Carlos Van Mieghem, Guy R Heyndrickx, Bernard De Bruyne, William Wijns |
| Abstract |
Fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement of intermediate coronary stenoses is recommended by guidelines when demonstration of ischemia by noninvasive testing is unavailable. The study aims to evaluate the penetration of this recommendation into current thinking about revascularization strategies for stable coronary artery disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 19% |
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Guinea | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 12 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 13% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 52% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2020.
All research outputs
#1,466,952
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
#182
of 1,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,481
of 273,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
#4
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,392 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.