↓ Skip to main content

A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Pregabalin and Gabapentin

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacokinetics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
497 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
Title
A Comparison of the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Pregabalin and Gabapentin
Published in
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, September 2012
DOI 10.2165/11536200-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Howard N. Bockbrader, David Wesche, Raymond Miller, Sunny Chapel, Nancy Janiczek, Paula Burger

Abstract

Pregabalin and gabapentin share a similar mechanism of action, inhibiting calcium influx and subsequent release of excitatory neurotransmitters; however, the compounds differ in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. Gabapentin is absorbed slowly after oral administration, with maximum plasma concentrations attained within 3-4 hours. Orally administered gabapentin exhibits saturable absorption--a nonlinear (zero-order) process--making its pharmacokinetics less predictable. Plasma concentrations of gabapentin do not increase proportionally with increasing dose. In contrast, orally administered pregabalin is absorbed more rapidly, with maximum plasma concentrations attained within 1 hour. Absorption is linear (first order), with plasma concentrations increasing proportionately with increasing dose. The absolute bioavailability of gabapentin drops from 60% to 33% as the dosage increases from 900 to 3600 mg/day, while the absolute bioavailability of pregabalin remains at > or = 90% irrespective of the dosage. Both drugs can be given without regard to meals. Neither drug binds to plasma proteins. Neither drug is metabolized by nor inhibits hepatic enzymes that are responsible for the metabolism of other drugs. Both drugs are excreted renally, with elimination half-lives of approximately 6 hours. Pregabalin and gabapentin both show dose-response relationships in the treatment of postherpetic neuralgia and partial seizures. For neuropathic pain, a pregabalin dosage of 450 mg/day appears to reduce pain comparably to the predicted maximum effect of gabapentin. As an antiepileptic, pregabalin may be more effective than gabapentin, on the basis of the magnitude of the reduction in the seizure frequency. In conclusion, pregabalin appears to have some distinct pharmacokinetic advantages over gabapentin that may translate into an improved pharmacodynamic effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 422 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 13%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Researcher 37 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Other 35 8%
Other 102 24%
Unknown 119 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 116 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 56 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 6%
Neuroscience 23 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 3%
Other 65 15%
Unknown 131 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,088,701
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#70
of 1,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,974
of 191,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacokinetics
#21
of 587 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 587 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.