| Title |
Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, April 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001340100909 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
N. Bergeron, M.-J. Dubois, M. Dumont, S. Dial, Y. Skrobik |
| Abstract |
Delirium in the intensive care unit is poorly defined. Clinical evaluation is difficult in the setting of unstable, often intubated patients. A screening tool may improve the detection of delirium. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Japan | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Australia | 2 | 12% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 76% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 12% |
| Scientists | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 543 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | <1% |
| Unknown | 521 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 74 | 14% |
| Researcher | 56 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 9% |
| Other | 44 | 8% |
| Other | 149 | 27% |
| Unknown | 119 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 256 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 69 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 3% |
| Psychology | 13 | 2% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 50 | 9% |
| Unknown | 131 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,083,187
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,013
of 5,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#658
of 43,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,512 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.