You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A randomized trial of protocol-directed sedation management for mechanical ventilation in an Australian intensive care unit*
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, May 2008
|
DOI | 10.1097/ccm.0b013e318168f82d |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tracey K. Bucknall, Elizabeth Manias, Jeffrey J. Presneill |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Brazil | 2 | 1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 150 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 30 | 19% |
Researcher | 22 | 14% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 9% |
Student > Master | 11 | 7% |
Professor | 11 | 7% |
Other | 45 | 28% |
Unknown | 24 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 56% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Other | 11 | 7% |
Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,111,270
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#2,156
of 9,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,946
of 89,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#12
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,339 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.