You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Radiofrequency Ablation of Liver Tumors: A Systematic Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA Surgery, February 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1001/archsurg.141.2.181 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leanne M. Sutherland, John A. R. Williams, Robert T. A. Padbury, David C. Gotley, Bryant Stokes, Guy J. Maddern |
| Abstract |
To systematically review radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating liver tumors. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Researcher | 7 | 18% |
| Professor | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 26% |
| Unknown | 6 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 42% |
| Engineering | 5 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Surgery
#3,599
of 5,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,396
of 170,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Surgery
#7
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,791 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,236 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.