| Title |
The effect of simulating leg length inequality on spinal posture and pelvic position: a dynamic rasterstereographic analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Spine Journal, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00586-011-1912-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcel Betsch, Michael Wild, Birgit Große, Walter Rapp, Thomas Horstmann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 100 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 98 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 40% |
| Engineering | 14 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Sports and Recreations | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Unknown | 22 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,541,325
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from European Spine Journal
#1,021
of 4,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,863
of 102,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Spine Journal
#21
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,665 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.