↓ Skip to main content

A first description of the Colombian national registry for rare diseases

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A first description of the Colombian national registry for rare diseases
Published in
BMC Research Notes, October 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13104-017-2840-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heidi Eliana Mateus, Ana María Pérez, Martha Lucía Mesa, Germán Escobar, Jubby Marcela Gálvez, José Ivo Montaño, Martha Lucía Ospina, Paul Laissue

Abstract

Orphan diseases must be considered a public health concern, underlying country-specific challenges for their accurate and opportune diagnosis, classification and management. Orphan disease registries have not yet been created in South America, a continent having a population of ~ 415 million inhabitants. In Colombia ~ 3 million of patients are affected by rare diseases. The aim of the present study was to establish the first Colombian national registry for rare diseases. The registry was created after the establishment of laws promoting the development of clinical guidelines for diagnosis, management, census and registry of patients suffering rare diseases. In total, 13,215 patients were recorded in the Colombian registry. The survey reported 653 rare diseases. The most common diseases were congenital factor VIII deficiency (hemophilia A) (8.5%), myasthenia gravis (6.4%), von Willebrand disease (5.9%), short stature due to growth hormone qualitative anomaly (4.2%), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (3.9%) and cystic fibrosis (3.2%). Although, a marked under-reporting of cases was observed, some pathologies displayed similar behavior to that reported by other initiatives and databases. The data currently available in the registry provides a baseline for improvement regarding local and regional surveys and the start for better understanding rare diseases in Colombia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 92 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Master 11 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Other 9 10%
Professor 8 9%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 21 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#15,278,707
of 25,013,816 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,951
of 4,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,084
of 333,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#55
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,013,816 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.