| Title |
Hyporheic annelid distribution along a flow permanence gradient in an alluvial river
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Aquatic Sciences, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00027-010-0139-6 |
| Authors |
T. Datry, M. Lafont, S. T. Larned |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 20% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 14 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2013.
All research outputs
#7,447,530
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Aquatic Sciences
#166
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,723
of 95,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Aquatic Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them