↓ Skip to main content

Hunter Self-monitoring by the Isoseño-Guaraní in the Bolivian Chaco

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
Title
Hunter Self-monitoring by the Isoseño-Guaraní in the Bolivian Chaco
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2005
DOI 10.1007/s10531-005-8401-2
Authors

Andrew J. Noss, Imke Oetting, Rosa Leny Cuéllar

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
United Kingdom 5 3%
South Africa 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 178 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 56 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 45 23%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Bachelor 12 6%
Other 33 17%
Unknown 9 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 92 46%
Environmental Science 73 37%
Social Sciences 8 4%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 16 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,131
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,309
of 60,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.