↓ Skip to main content

CIB2, defective in isolated deafness, is key for auditory hair cell mechanotransduction and survival

Overview of attention for article published in EMBO Molecular Medicine, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CIB2, defective in isolated deafness, is key for auditory hair cell mechanotransduction and survival
Published in
EMBO Molecular Medicine, December 2017
DOI 10.15252/emmm.201708087
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vincent Michel, Kevin T Booth, Pranav Patni, Matteo Cortese, Hela Azaiez, Amel Bahloul, Kimia Kahrizi, Ménélik Labbé, Alice Emptoz, Andrea Lelli, Julie Dégardin, Typhaine Dupont, Asadollah Aghaie, Danuta Oficjalska‐Pham, Serge Picaud, Hossein Najmabadi, Richard J Smith, Michael R Bowl, Steven DM Brown, Paul Avan, Christine Petit, Aziz El‐Amraoui

Abstract

Defects of CIB2, calcium- and integrin-binding protein 2, have been reported to cause isolated deafness, DFNB48 and Usher syndrome type-IJ, characterized by congenital profound deafness, balance defects and blindness. We report here two new nonsense mutations (pGln12* and pTyr110*) in CIB2 patients displaying nonsyndromic profound hearing loss, with no evidence of vestibular or retinal dysfunction. Also, the generated CIB2(-/-) mice display an early onset profound deafness and have normal balance and retinal functions. In these mice, the mechanoelectrical transduction currents are totally abolished in the auditory hair cells, whilst they remain unchanged in the vestibular hair cells. The hair bundle morphological abnormalities of CIB2(-/-) mice, unlike those of mice defective for the other five known USH1 proteins, begin only after birth and lead to regression of the stereocilia and rapid hair-cell death. This essential role of CIB2 in mechanotransduction and cell survival that, we show, is restricted to the cochlea, probably accounts for the presence in CIB2(-/-) mice and CIB2 patients, unlike in Usher syndrome, of isolated hearing loss without balance and vision deficits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 5 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 4%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 24 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 26%
Neuroscience 8 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 26 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2018.
All research outputs
#13,572,275
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from EMBO Molecular Medicine
#1,193
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,914
of 437,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EMBO Molecular Medicine
#31
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.