↓ Skip to main content

The Influence of Food Texture and Liquid Consistency Modification on Swallowing Physiology and Function: A Systematic Review

Overview of attention for article published in Dysphagia, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 1,398)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
36 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
19 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
429 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
683 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Influence of Food Texture and Liquid Consistency Modification on Swallowing Physiology and Function: A Systematic Review
Published in
Dysphagia, October 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00455-014-9578-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Catriona M. Steele, Woroud Abdulrahman Alsanei, Sona Ayanikalath, Carly E. A. Barbon, Jianshe Chen, Julie A. Y. Cichero, Kim Coutts, Roberto O. Dantas, Janice Duivestein, Lidia Giosa, Ben Hanson, Peter Lam, Caroline Lecko, Chelsea Leigh, Ahmed Nagy, Ashwini M. Namasivayam, Weslania V. Nascimento, Inge Odendaal, Christina H. Smith, Helen Wang

Abstract

Texture modification has become one of the most common forms of intervention for dysphagia, and is widely considered important for promoting safe and efficient swallowing. However, to date, there is no single convention with respect to the terminology used to describe levels of liquid thickening or food texture modification for clinical use. As a first step toward building a common taxonomy, a systematic review was undertaken to identify empirical evidence describing the impact of liquid consistency and food texture on swallowing behavior. A multi-engine search yielded 10,147 non-duplicate articles, which were screened for relevance. A team of ten international researchers collaborated to conduct full-text reviews for 488 of these articles, which met the study inclusion criteria. Of these, 36 articles were found to contain specific information comparing oral processing or swallowing behaviors for at least two liquid consistencies or food textures. Qualitative synthesis revealed two key trends with respect to the impact of thickening liquids on swallowing: thicker liquids reduce the risk of penetration-aspiration, but also increase the risk of post-swallow residue in the pharynx. The literature was insufficient to support the delineation of specific viscosity boundaries or other quantifiable material properties related to these clinical outcomes. With respect to food texture, the literature pointed to properties of hardness, cohesiveness, and slipperiness as being relevant both for physiological behaviors and bolus flow patterns. The literature suggests a need to classify food and fluid behavior in the context of the physiological processes involved in oral transport and flow initiation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 683 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 681 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 108 16%
Student > Bachelor 91 13%
Other 58 8%
Researcher 56 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 8%
Other 139 20%
Unknown 177 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 173 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 129 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 7%
Engineering 20 3%
Linguistics 16 2%
Other 93 14%
Unknown 203 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#544,529
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Dysphagia
#9
of 1,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,606
of 277,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dysphagia
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.