You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving CFD prediction of drag on Paralympic tandem athletes: influence of grid resolution and turbulence model
|
---|---|
Published in |
Sports Engineering, October 2017
|
DOI | 10.1007/s12283-017-0258-6 |
Authors |
Paul Mannion, Yasin Toparlar, Bert Blocken, Magdalena Hajdukiewicz, Thomas Andrianne, Eoghan Clifford |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 14% |
Netherlands | 4 | 10% |
Ireland | 3 | 7% |
United States | 2 | 5% |
France | 2 | 5% |
Belgium | 1 | 2% |
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 34 | 81% |
Scientists | 5 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 21% |
Researcher | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Lecturer | 4 | 8% |
Other | 10 | 19% |
Unknown | 9 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 23 | 43% |
Sports and Recreations | 9 | 17% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,204,736
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from Sports Engineering
#15
of 403 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,647
of 340,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Engineering
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 403 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,361 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.