↓ Skip to main content

The progress of the betting in a baseball game

Overview of attention for article published in Public Choice, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The progress of the betting in a baseball game
Published in
Public Choice, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s11127-009-9544-6
Authors

Raymond D. Sauer, J. Kerry Waller, Jahn K. Hakes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 7%
Unknown 13 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Researcher 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 3 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 21%
Sports and Recreations 3 21%
Computer Science 1 7%
Philosophy 1 7%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2017.
All research outputs
#13,220,095
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Public Choice
#807
of 1,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,239
of 95,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Choice
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,193 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.