| Title |
Halloysite Nanotubes/Polyethylene Nanocomposites for Active Food Packaging Materials with Ethylene Scavenging and Gas Barrier Properties
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Food and Bioprocess Technology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11947-017-1860-0 |
| Authors |
C. Erdinc Tas, Saman Hendessi, Mustafa Baysal, Serkan Unal, Fevzi C. Cebeci, Yusuf Z. Menceloglu, Hayriye Unal |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 163 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 66 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 12% |
| Chemistry | 17 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 15 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 74 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,129,652
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Food and Bioprocess Technology
#95
of 417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,991
of 427,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Food and Bioprocess Technology
#4
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 417 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,699 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.