↓ Skip to main content

Diet-induced obesity leads to pro-inflammatory alterations to the vitreous humour of the eye in a rat model

Overview of attention for article published in Inflammation Research, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Diet-induced obesity leads to pro-inflammatory alterations to the vitreous humour of the eye in a rat model
Published in
Inflammation Research, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00011-017-1102-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kelsey H. Collins, Walter Herzog, Raylene A. Reimer, Carol R. Reno, Bryan J. Heard, David A. Hart

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate if diet-induced obesity (DIO) and subsequent low-level systemic inflammation would result in local increases in pro-inflammatory mediators in the vitreous humour (VH) of the eyes of rats. Sixteen male Sprague-Dawley rats were fed a high-fat/high-sucrose (n = 9) or chow control-diet (n = 7) for 12-weeks. RT-qPCR was conducted on RNA from VH cells and a 27-plex Luminex(®) Assay was conducted on VH fluid and serum. Increased protein levels for IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-18 in both serum and VH fluid were observed. VH protein levels for IL-13 and IL-17 were also increased. All mediators significantly increased in VH fluid were also positively correlated with percent body fat. Increased mRNA levels in VH cells for an oxidative stress molecule were accompanied by decreased mRNA levels for an antioxidant scavenger, suggesting an antioxidant/oxidant imbalance in the VH with DIO. In addition, decreased mRNA levels for TRAIL, FAS-L and TGF-β, molecules associated with immune privilege, were also significantly depressed. DIO-related metabolic disturbances disrupt VH homeostasis in a manner that reflects development of a pro-inflammatory environment. Prolonged exposure to such an environment may lead to overt pathologies with compromised eye function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Professor 2 6%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 9 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Engineering 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 11 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#13,572,617
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Inflammation Research
#553
of 961 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,530
of 327,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Inflammation Research
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 961 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.