| Title |
Comparison of integrative nature conservation in forest policy in Europe: a qualitative pilot study of institutional determinants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-014-0817-0 |
| Authors |
Tobias Schulz, Frank Krumm, Winfried Bücking, Georg Frank, Daniel Kraus, Markus Lier, Marko Lovrić, Marieke van der Maaten-Theunissen, Yoan Paillet, Jari Parviainen, Giorgio Vacchiano, Kris Vandekerkhove |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 15 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#15,630,207
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,849
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,871
of 258,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#17
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.