↓ Skip to main content

Seizures in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Seizures in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
Published in
CNS Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/11310900-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brendan J. Kelley, Moses Rodriguez

Abstract

Seizures have been recognized to occur in multiple sclerosis (MS) since early descriptions of the disease. Various studies have attempted to determine the incidence and prevalence of seizures in MS; although they differ in the reported prevalence, seizures do appear to be more common in MS cohorts than in the general population. The pathological underpinning of seizures in MS remains indeterminate. Cortical and subcortical demyelination and inflammation may explain the increased frequency of seizures in MS, although this hypothetical correlation remains to be proven. Management of seizures in MS is similar to the management of seizures in other patients. Consideration of the underlying neurological deficits related to MS may be necessary, and dosages of antiepileptic drugs should be adjusted if increased sensitivity to the adverse effects of these agents or interaction with other centrally acting medications is suspected. The prognosis of epilepsy in patients with MS remains uncertain, with some studies suggesting a more favourable prognosis than others.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 53 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Researcher 8 15%
Other 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 42%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 12 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,063,164
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from CNS Drugs
#147
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,279
of 187,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Drugs
#48
of 541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.