| Title |
Feral cat eradication in the presence of endemic San Nicolas Island foxes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-014-0784-0 |
| Authors |
Chad C. Hanson, Wesley J. Jolley, Grace Smith, David K. Garcelon, Bradford S. Keitt, Annie E. Little, Karl J. Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 40% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 54 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 18% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 16% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,543,943
of 24,674,524 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#531
of 2,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,850
of 258,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#6
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,674,524 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,475 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.