| Title |
Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Translational Stroke Research, April 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12975-016-0467-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jessica M. Cassidy, Steven C. Cramer |
| Abstract |
With increasing rates of survival throughout the past several years, stroke remains one of the leading causes of adult disability. Following the onset of stroke, spontaneous mechanisms of recovery at the cellular, molecular, and systems levels ensue. The degree of spontaneous recovery is generally incomplete and variable among individuals. Typically, the best recovery outcomes entail the restitution of function in injured but surviving neural matter. An assortment of restorative therapies exists or is under development with the goal of potentiating restitution of function in damaged areas or in nearby ipsilesional regions by fostering neuroplastic changes, which often rely on mechanisms similar to those observed during spontaneous recovery. Advancements in stroke rehabilitation depend on the elucidation of both spontaneous and therapeutic-driven mechanisms of recovery. Further, the implementation of neural biomarkers in research and clinical settings will enable a multimodal approach to probing brain state and predicting the extent of post-stroke functional recovery. This review will discuss spontaneous and therapeutic-induced mechanisms driving post-stroke functional recovery while underscoring several potential restorative therapies and biomarkers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 297 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 13% |
| Researcher | 23 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 88 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 67 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 11% |
| Engineering | 19 | 6% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 99 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2022.
All research outputs
#3,141,735
of 23,435,471 outputs
Outputs from Translational Stroke Research
#27
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,597
of 300,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Stroke Research
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,435,471 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them