| Title |
Methodologies for social life cycle assessment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, December 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1065/lca2007.11.367 |
| Authors |
Andreas Jørgensen, Agathe Le Bocq, Liudmila Nazarkina, Michael Hauschild |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 739 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | <1% |
| Unknown | 715 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 149 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 127 | 17% |
| Researcher | 109 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 5% |
| Other | 108 | 15% |
| Unknown | 166 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 171 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 131 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 44 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 33 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 4% |
| Other | 110 | 15% |
| Unknown | 223 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#3,505,282
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#174
of 978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,169
of 161,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them