↓ Skip to main content

From fixed activities to personalized treatments in radionuclide therapy: lost in translation?

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
From fixed activities to personalized treatments in radionuclide therapy: lost in translation?
Published in
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00259-017-3859-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

G. D. Flux, K. Sjogreen Gleisner, C. Chiesa, M. Lassmann, N. Chouin, J. Gear, M. Bardiès, S. Walrand, K. Bacher, U. Eberlein, M. Ljungberg, L. Strigari, E. Visser, M. W. Konijnenberg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Master 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 28%
Physics and Astronomy 11 22%
Engineering 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 12 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2018.
All research outputs
#13,324,328
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#1,610
of 3,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,735
of 330,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
#14
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.