↓ Skip to main content

Ebola and Quarantine

Overview of attention for article published in New England Journal of Medicine, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
41 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
142 X users
facebook
351 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
11 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
194 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ebola and Quarantine
Published in
New England Journal of Medicine, October 2014
DOI 10.1056/nejme1413139
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey M Drazen, Rupa Kanapathipillai, Edward W Campion, Eric J Rubin, Scott M Hammer, Stephen Morrissey, Lindsey R Baden

Abstract

The governors of a number of states, including New York and New Jersey, recently imposed 21-day quarantines on health care workers returning to the United States from regions of the world where they may have cared for patients with Ebola virus disease. We understand their motivation for this policy - to protect the citizens of their states from contracting this often-fatal illness. This approach, however, is not scientifically based, is unfair and unwise, and will impede essential efforts to stop these awful outbreaks of Ebola disease at their source, which is the only satisfactory goal. The governors' action is like . . .

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 142 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 194 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 185 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 19%
Researcher 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 13 7%
Other 44 23%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 67 35%
Social Sciences 22 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 29 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 654. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2022.
All research outputs
#33,829
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#1,266
of 32,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235
of 274,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#7
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.