| Title |
Deception and its Detection Under Synchronous and Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Communication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Group Decision and Negotiation, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10726-009-9168-8 |
| Authors |
Judee K. Burgoon, Fang Chen, Douglas P. Twitchell |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 26 | 25% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 19 | 19% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#7,917,073
of 23,857,313 outputs
Outputs from Group Decision and Negotiation
#36
of 161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,813
of 113,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Group Decision and Negotiation
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,857,313 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,494 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them