↓ Skip to main content

Myoloid-Related Protein 8, an Endogenous Ligand of Toll-Like Receptor 4, Is Involved in Epileptogenesis of Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Via Activation of the Nuclear Factor-κB Pathway in Astrocytes

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurobiology, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
Myoloid-Related Protein 8, an Endogenous Ligand of Toll-Like Receptor 4, Is Involved in Epileptogenesis of Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Via Activation of the Nuclear Factor-κB Pathway in Astrocytes
Published in
Molecular Neurobiology, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12035-013-8522-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Na Gan, Lifen Yang, Ahmed Omran, Jing Peng, Liwen Wu, Fang He, Ciliu Zhang, Qiulian Xiang, Huimin Kong, Yupin Ma, Muhammad Usman Ashhab, Xiaolu Deng, Fei Yin

Abstract

The role of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in the activation of innate immunity has been extensively studied in the past several years. Here, we are the first to report that myeloid-related protein 8 (MRP8), an endogenous TLR4 ligand, is involved in the epileptogenesis of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE). We find that the expression of MRP8, TLR4, and interleukin 1-β (IL-1β) was upregulated in a MTLE model during both acute and chronic disease stages. We next investigated the possible roles played by astrocytes, which have been shown to be the major source of IL-1β during epilepsy. Stimulation via MRP8 led to the induction of IL-1β in astrocytes in vitro, accompanied by the activation of Nuclear Factor-κB, while knockdown of TLR4 or inhibition of NF-κB in astrocytes prevented this IL-1β induction. Thus, MRP8 may potentiate the perpetuation of MTLE by activating the NF-κB pathway in astrocytes, and could be a new target for anticonvulsant therapies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Student > Master 4 20%
Researcher 3 15%
Professor 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 20%
Neuroscience 3 15%
Psychology 2 10%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2014.
All research outputs
#20,241,019
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurobiology
#2,778
of 3,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,588
of 200,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurobiology
#22
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.