↓ Skip to main content

Mycorrhizal associations and the spatial structure of an old-growth forest community

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Mycorrhizal associations and the spatial structure of an old-growth forest community
Published in
Oecologia, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00442-017-3987-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel J. Johnson, Keith Clay, Richard P. Phillips

Abstract

Plant-soil feedbacks are known to play a central role in species co-existence, but conceptual frameworks for predicting their magnitude and direction are lacking. We ask whether co-occurring trees that associate with different types of mycorrhizal fungi, which are hypothesized to differ in terms of nutrient use and plant-soil feedbacks, differ in sapling establishment densities and probability of co-occurrence. Given that ectomycorrhizal (ECM) trees typically have fungal structures that protect roots from pathogens whereas arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) trees do not, we hypothesized that ECM saplings would be clustered around ECM trees, while AM saplings would be suppressed near AM trees. Most previous studies have focused on seedlings, but here we examine whether the spatial signal is evident in later life stages. We measured the spatial associations of ~ 28,000 trees using point pattern analysis in a 25-ha old-growth forest where ECM trees comprised 72% of total basal area and 42% of the total stems, while AM trees comprised the remainder. Supporting our hypothesis, AM saplings were more inhibited by AM trees, while ECM saplings were more clustered around ECM trees. The spatial patterns of AM and ECM trees on saplings of the alternate mycorrhizal type were inhibited. To the extent that similar types of feedbacks occur for other AM and ECM trees, our results suggest that fundamental differences in the nature of local-scale biotic interactions between trees and their fungal symbionts may influence forest community assembly and ecosystem dynamics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 20%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 27 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 41 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 32%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 32 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2020.
All research outputs
#3,262,554
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#548
of 4,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,018
of 335,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#18
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.