↓ Skip to main content

Die Historizität der Verdatung: Konzepte, Werkzeuge und Praktiken im 19. Jahrhundert

Overview of attention for article published in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 220)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Die Historizität der Verdatung: Konzepte, Werkzeuge und Praktiken im 19. Jahrhundert
Published in
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin, October 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00048-017-0183-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine von Oertzen

Abstract

This essay explores the use of the concept of "data" during the nineteenth century. It traces the development of manual data driven research decades before the introduction of Hollerith machines and electronic computers. Census statisticians in late-nineteenth century Prussia employed moveable paper tools to assemble numerical information in novel ways; their actions fundamentally recast processes of compilation. The paper considers the epistemic impact of moving data inscribed on tons of paper, reconstructing the logistics of a circulatory compilation system spread across the Prussian capital. The movement of data in Wilhelmine Berlin reached outward from the statistical bureau to encompass the homes of many women, enlisted in a minutely-orchestrated putting out system. The essay scrutinizes the social and intellectual requirements necessary to classify, sort, and aggregate the information on the loose paper slips fast and without error. For all of their inventiveness, Prussian statisticians were neither the first nor the only ones to gather, process and visualize data in imaginative ways. As this essay demonstrates, many so-called "Baconian" sciences developed similar tools and practices to those of Prussian statisticians. Making and moving data sparked historical sensitivity in disciplines well beyond population statistics, from taxonomy to paleontology, yielding unexpected revelations.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,363,956
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
#18
of 220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,165
of 329,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them