↓ Skip to main content

Bayesian multi-model projection of climate: bias assumptions and interannual variability

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
156 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
143 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Bayesian multi-model projection of climate: bias assumptions and interannual variability
Published in
Climate Dynamics, May 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00382-009-0588-6
Authors

Christoph M. Buser, H. R. Künsch, D. Lüthi, M. Wild, C. Schär

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 1%
Italy 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 131 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 27%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 5 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 14 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 46 32%
Environmental Science 32 22%
Engineering 20 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Computer Science 5 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 23 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,753,975
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,090
of 5,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,089
of 107,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#11
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.