| Title |
Changes in storm tracks and energy transports in a warmer climate simulated by the GFDL CM2.1 model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Climate Dynamics, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00382-010-0776-4 |
| Authors |
Yutian Wu, Mingfang Ting, Richard Seager, Huei-Ping Huang, Mark A. Cane |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 5% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 31% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 13% |
| Unknown | 11 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 73 | 62% |
| Environmental Science | 18 | 15% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,541,325
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,033
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,799
of 94,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.