↓ Skip to main content

Preparedness and storm hazards in a global warming world: lessons from Southeast Asia

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Hazards, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Preparedness and storm hazards in a global warming world: lessons from Southeast Asia
Published in
Natural Hazards, August 2010
DOI 10.1007/s11069-010-9581-y
Authors

Chew-Hung Chang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 26%
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Master 12 23%
Other 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 14 26%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 9 17%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Engineering 6 11%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 8 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,541,325
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#854
of 1,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,163
of 95,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.