↓ Skip to main content

Resolved Versus Parametrized Boundary-Layer Plumes. Part II: Continuous Formulations of Mixing Rates for Mass-Flux Schemes

Overview of attention for article published in Boundary-Layer Meteorology, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Resolved Versus Parametrized Boundary-Layer Plumes. Part II: Continuous Formulations of Mixing Rates for Mass-Flux Schemes
Published in
Boundary-Layer Meteorology, March 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10546-010-9478-z
Authors

C. Rio, F. Hourdin, F. Couvreux, A. Jam

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 22%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 53%
Environmental Science 6 19%
Engineering 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,541,325
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Boundary-Layer Meteorology
#119
of 725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,805
of 94,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Boundary-Layer Meteorology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 725 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.