↓ Skip to main content

Precalibrating an intermediate complexity climate model

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Precalibrating an intermediate complexity climate model
Published in
Climate Dynamics, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00382-010-0921-0
Authors

Neil R. Edwards, David Cameron, Jonathan Rougier

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 36%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Professor 5 7%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 8 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 29 38%
Mathematics 8 11%
Environmental Science 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,541,325
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,033
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,466
of 99,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#13
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.