↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the WAMME model surface fluxes using results from the AMMA land-surface model intercomparison project

Overview of attention for article published in Climate Dynamics, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Evaluation of the WAMME model surface fluxes using results from the AMMA land-surface model intercomparison project
Published in
Climate Dynamics, September 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00382-009-0653-1
Authors

Aaron Anthony Boone, Isabelle Poccard-Leclercq, Yongkang Xue, Jinming Feng, Patricia de Rosnay

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Italy 1 3%
Unknown 32 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Lecturer 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 13 38%
Environmental Science 8 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,541,325
of 23,007,053 outputs
Outputs from Climate Dynamics
#2,033
of 4,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,800
of 81,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Climate Dynamics
#12
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,007,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.