↓ Skip to main content

Atmospheric Aerosol and Cloud Condensation Nuclei Formation: A Possible Influence of Cosmic Rays?

Overview of attention for article published in Space Science Reviews, February 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Atmospheric Aerosol and Cloud Condensation Nuclei Formation: A Possible Influence of Cosmic Rays?
Published in
Space Science Reviews, February 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11214-006-9055-4
Authors

F. Arnold

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 29%
Student > Master 8 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 15 33%
Environmental Science 7 16%
Chemistry 7 16%
Physics and Astronomy 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2013.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#614
of 1,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,505
of 173,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.