You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Peripheral intravenous devices in kids emergency
|
---|---|
Published in |
Emergency Medicine Australasia, October 2014
|
DOI | 10.1111/1742-6723.12305 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lorelle Malyon, Amanda J Ullman, Natalie Phillips, Jeanine Young, Tricia Kleidon, Jenny Murfield, Claire M Rickard |
Abstract |
Children admitted to hospital commonly require peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) for treatment. This study sought to address a gap in the literature about current practice in the securement and dressing of PIVCs in paediatric acute care, and to ascertain the duration and failure of these devices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 113 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 14% |
Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 10% |
Other | 8 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 20% |
Unknown | 34 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 34% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 19% |
Engineering | 7 | 6% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,062,527
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Medicine Australasia
#530
of 1,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,658
of 265,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Medicine Australasia
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.