↓ Skip to main content

Peripheral intravenous devices in kids emergency

Overview of attention for article published in Emergency Medicine Australasia, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peripheral intravenous devices in kids emergency
Published in
Emergency Medicine Australasia, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/1742-6723.12305
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorelle Malyon, Amanda J Ullman, Natalie Phillips, Jeanine Young, Tricia Kleidon, Jenny Murfield, Claire M Rickard

Abstract

Children admitted to hospital commonly require peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) for treatment. This study sought to address a gap in the literature about current practice in the securement and dressing of PIVCs in paediatric acute care, and to ascertain the duration and failure of these devices.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 15 13%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 23 20%
Unknown 34 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 39 34%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 19%
Engineering 7 6%
Computer Science 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 37 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,062,527
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from Emergency Medicine Australasia
#530
of 1,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,658
of 265,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emergency Medicine Australasia
#6
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,875 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.