↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Antiangiogenic Treatment Effects in Multiple Myeloma

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Assessment of Antiangiogenic Treatment Effects in Multiple Myeloma
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, January 2015
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-14-1029
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Purpose: To non-invasively assess bone marrow microcirculation before and after therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI). Experimental Design: 96 patients received DCE-MRI before and after primary treatment for newly diagnosed MM. For the 91 evaluable patients, treatment consisted of high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in 82 patients and chemotherapy without ASCT in 9 patients. Additionally, 33 healthy volunteers were imaged as control group. Analysis of DCE-MRI was performed according to the two-compartment model by Brix to quantify amplitude A (associated with blood volume) and exchange rate constant kep (reflecting vessel permeability and perfusion). Results: Non-responders showed significantly higher A-values before the start of therapy compared to responders (p=0.02). In both, responders and non-responders to therapy, A-values dropped significantly (p=0.004 and <0.001, respectively) after primary therapy while lower values for kep were only found in responders (p<0.001). Depth of remission was significantly correlated to decreased bone marrow microcirculation: Patients in near complete (nCR) or complete remission (CR) after treatment showed significantly lower values for A compared to patients not achieving nCR+CR. The application of HDT or novel agents had no significant effect on DCE-MRI parameters after therapy, although patients treated with novel agents achieved more often nCR+CR (42%/12.5%;p<0.002). Higher kep-values at 2nd MRI were positively correlated to shorter overall survival (HR 3.53; 95% CI 1.21,10.33; p=0.02). Conclusions: Parameters from DCE-MRI are correlated to remission after primary therapy and outcome in newly diagnosed MM.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Other 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 55%
Engineering 5 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Physics and Astronomy 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2016.
All research outputs
#21,873,385
of 34,350,842 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#14,685
of 17,842 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,081
of 409,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#125
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,350,842 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,842 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.