↓ Skip to main content

Friends with social benefits: host-microbe interactions as a driver of brain evolution and development?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
45 X users
facebook
13 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
385 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Friends with social benefits: host-microbe interactions as a driver of brain evolution and development?
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00147
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roman M. Stilling, Seth R. Bordenstein, Timothy G. Dinan, John F. Cryan

Abstract

The tight association of the human body with trillions of colonizing microbes that we observe today is the result of a long evolutionary history. Only very recently have we started to understand how this symbiosis also affects brain function and behavior. In this hypothesis and theory article, we propose how host-microbe associations potentially influenced mammalian brain evolution and development. In particular, we explore the integration of human brain development with evolution, symbiosis, and RNA biology, which together represent a "social triangle" that drives human social behavior and cognition. We argue that, in order to understand how inter-kingdom communication can affect brain adaptation and plasticity, it is inevitable to consider epigenetic mechanisms as important mediators of genome-microbiome interactions on an individual as well as a transgenerational time scale. Finally, we unite these interpretations with the hologenome theory of evolution. Taken together, we propose a tighter integration of neuroscience fields with host-associated microbiology by taking an evolutionary perspective.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 385 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 371 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 18%
Student > Bachelor 64 17%
Researcher 63 16%
Student > Master 54 14%
Other 16 4%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 57 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 9%
Neuroscience 24 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 4%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 72 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2022.
All research outputs
#741,165
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#120
of 8,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,986
of 275,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,218 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.